The System Isn't Broken. It's Fixed
This paper has two distinct and related aims. First, I attempt to clarify the oft-made claim that somehow the system is fixed. What is meant by that charge and how is it distinct from other kinds of complaints with regard to economic inequality? Second, I attempt to show how important it is to und...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
| In: |
Religions
Jahr: 2017, Band: 8, Heft: 4, Seiten: 1-6 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
equality of opportunity
B John Rawls B equality of outcome B Egalitarianism B Elizabeth Anderson B joint cooperative activity |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper has two distinct and related aims. First, I attempt to clarify the oft-made claim that somehow the system is fixed. What is meant by that charge and how is it distinct from other kinds of complaints with regard to economic inequality? Second, I attempt to show how important it is to understand what we are doing together as members of a (political) economy. Without a clear conception of our joint, collaborative active, it is difficult to have a fruitful discussion of economic justice. Throughout the paper, I borrow insights from the philosopher Elizabeth Anderson. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel8040057 |