What Business do Businesses Have with the Free Exercise of Religion?
Since Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), federal and state religious freedom restoration acts now extend the right to free exercise of religion to businesses. But what does it mean for businesses to have such a right? In this paper, I identify three implications of these new rights: they shift the burde...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: 171-194 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
USA
/ Jurisdiction
/ Religious freedom
/ Trade
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy ZB Sociology ZC Politics in general |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Since Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), federal and state religious freedom restoration acts now extend the right to free exercise of religion to businesses. But what does it mean for businesses to have such a right? In this paper, I identify three implications of these new rights: they shift the burden for fulfilling the right to private citizens, and they conflict with businesses' both commercial and democratic obligations. To illustrate how they become problematic, I draw on the case of In re Wathen (2015) where the owners of a bed and breakfast cited their business's religion as their reason for refusing to host a wedding reception for a same-sex couple, even though state law specifically prohibited commercial businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-0491 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Politics and religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S1755048318000524 |