Out of Context: Newman and Marion on Religion, Revelation, and Hermeneutics

This paper offers, first, an analysis and critique of John Henry Newman's theorizing of real assent, in comparison with Jean-Luc Marion's own phenomenological investigation of Revelation and Religious Experience. In conversation with the results of these analyses, I offer a critique of a c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: DuPée, C. Andrew (Author) ; Philosophy Documentation Center (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center [2018]
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-122
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Newman, John Henry, Saint 1801-1890 / Marion, Jean-Luc 1946- / Revelation / Religious experience / Hermeneutics
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBB Doctrine of Revelation
NBE Anthropology
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This paper offers, first, an analysis and critique of John Henry Newman's theorizing of real assent, in comparison with Jean-Luc Marion's own phenomenological investigation of Revelation and Religious Experience. In conversation with the results of these analyses, I offer a critique of a certain hermeneutical criticism of Marion's oeuvre. This, as I attempt to show, dovetails with certain strong criticisms towards Newman's own interpretation of religious experience, insofar as it highlights the demand for some discussion or theorization of a standpoint beyond hermeneutic circularity.
ISSN:2153-828X
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/philtheol20186792