Out of Context: Newman and Marion on Religion, Revelation, and Hermeneutics
This paper offers, first, an analysis and critique of John Henry Newman's theorizing of real assent, in comparison with Jean-Luc Marion's own phenomenological investigation of Revelation and Religious Experience. In conversation with the results of these analyses, I offer a critique of a c...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
[2018]
|
In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 30, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-122 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Newman, John Henry, Saint 1801-1890
/ Marion, Jean-Luc 1946-
/ Revelation
/ Religious experience
/ Hermeneutics
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDB Roman Catholic Church NBB Doctrine of Revelation NBE Anthropology VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This paper offers, first, an analysis and critique of John Henry Newman's theorizing of real assent, in comparison with Jean-Luc Marion's own phenomenological investigation of Revelation and Religious Experience. In conversation with the results of these analyses, I offer a critique of a certain hermeneutical criticism of Marion's oeuvre. This, as I attempt to show, dovetails with certain strong criticisms towards Newman's own interpretation of religious experience, insofar as it highlights the demand for some discussion or theorization of a standpoint beyond hermeneutic circularity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-828X |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol20186792 |