The great Iranian divide: between aniconic West and anthropomorphic East

The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religion
Main Author: Shenkar, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group [2017]
In: Religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Iran (Antiquity) / Kushana, Dynastie : 200 BC-300 / Sogdians / Zoroastrianism / Religious art / Iconic element / Anthropomorphism / Image prohibition
RelBib Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
BC Ancient Orient; religion
KBM Asia
Further subjects:B Sasanian
B Aniconism
B Iran
B Sogdian
B Achaemenian
B Zoroastrianism
B Anthropomorphism
B Kushan
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were aniconic, Eastern Iranian people, like the Kushans and the Sogdians, not only made use of portrayals of their gods in human form, but also venerated their man-made representations in temples. This article suggests that the reason for this sharp distinction in the nature of the cult between Western and Eastern Iran is the impact of acculturated Greek religious practices, which was much stronger in the East than in the West.
ISSN:0048-721X
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2017.1330989