La science peut-elle prouver l'inexistence de Dieu?
In this article, Peter van Inwagen considers arguments for the inexistence of God. He looks at possible scientific proofs for the non-existence of God, and concludes that any argument for the non-existence of God must contain a philosophical premise or sub-argument. He then goes on to show that no p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | French |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Bellarmin
2004
|
In: |
Science et esprit
Year: 2004, Volume: 56, Issue: 3, Pages: 285-302 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Atheism
B Existence of God B Proof of God's existence |
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Summary: | In this article, Peter van Inwagen considers arguments for the inexistence of God. He looks at possible scientific proofs for the non-existence of God, and concludes that any argument for the non-existence of God must contain a philosophical premise or sub-argument. He then goes on to show that no philosophical argument can compel us to believe in the existence or non-existence of God. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0316-5345 |
Contains: | In: Science et esprit
|