Punishment, Jesters and Judges: a Response to Nathan Hanna
Nathan Hanna has recently argued against a position I defend in a 2013 paper in this journal and in my 2016 book on punishment, namely that we can punish someone without intending to harm them. In this discussion note I explain why two alleged counterexamples to my view put forward by Hanna are not...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2019]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2019, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-12 |
RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics VA Philosophy XA Law |
Further subjects: | B
Punishment
B H.L.A.Hart B Harm B Conceptual Analysis B Folk theories |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1662931352 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200420095532.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190408s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-018-9966-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1662931352 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1662931352 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)108108295X |0 (DE-627)845562258 |0 (DE-576)453931618 |4 aut |a Wringe, William |d 1970- | |
109 | |a Wringe, William 1970- |a Wringe, Bill 1970- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Punishment, Jesters and Judges |b a Response to Nathan Hanna |c Bill Wringe |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Nathan Hanna has recently argued against a position I defend in a 2013 paper in this journal and in my 2016 book on punishment, namely that we can punish someone without intending to harm them. In this discussion note I explain why two alleged counterexamples to my view put forward by Hanna are not in fact counterexamples to any view I hold, produce an example which shows that, if we accept a number of Hanna's own assumptions, punishment does not require an intention to harm, and discuss whether a definition and counter-example approach is the best way to proceed in the philosophy of punishment. I conclude with a brief exegetical discussion of H.L.A Hart's Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Conceptual Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Folk theories | |
650 | 4 | |a H.L.A.Hart | |
650 | 4 | |a Harm | |
650 | 4 | |a Punishment | |
652 | |a NCA:VA:XA | ||
700 | 1 | |a Hanna, Nathan |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 22(2019), 1, Seite 3-12 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:3-12 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Hanna, Nathan |t The Nature of Punishment Revisited |d 2020 |w (DE-627)1694953572 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9966-7 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3420939132 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1662931352 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191107121222 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190408||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |