What's Love Got to Do with it? An Ecofeminist Approach to Inter-Animal and Intra-Cultural Conflicts of Interest

Many familial and cultural traditions rely on animals for their fulfillment - think of Christmas ham, Rosh Hashannah chicken soup, Fourth of July barbeques, and so forth. Though philosophers writing in animal ethics often dismiss interests in certain foods as trivial, these food-based traditions pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethical theory and moral practice
1. VerfasserIn: Emmerman, Karen S. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
RelBib Classification:AG Religiöses Leben; materielle Religion
NCB Individualethik
NCG Ökologische Ethik; Schöpfungsethik
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Animals
B moral repair
B Nonbasic interests
B Veganism
B Foodways
B Gender
B Jewish vegetarianism
B conflicts of interest
B Ecofeminism
B Culture
B intersectional veganism
B Basic interests
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many familial and cultural traditions rely on animals for their fulfillment - think of Christmas ham, Rosh Hashannah chicken soup, Fourth of July barbeques, and so forth. Though philosophers writing in animal ethics often dismiss interests in certain foods as trivial, these food-based traditions pose a significant moral problem for those who take animals' lives and interests seriously. One must either turn one's back on one's community or on the animals. In this paper, I consider the under-theorized area of intra-cultural critique. My focus is how we should think about and seek to resolve inter-animal conflicts of interest that arise within our own communities and cultural or religious groups. How should a theory that takes animals seriously approach a conflict between animals' interests and culturally important human interests in the context of one's own cultural, ethnic, or religious group? How, for example, should we think about the person staring down at a bowl of her grandmother's chicken soup while recognizing the moral impermissibility of slaughtering chickens for human consumption? In contrast to traditional approaches that fail to take these robust, food-based, interests into account, I offer an ecofeminist approach that highlights the importance of respecting animals' interests while also undertaking the work of moral repair to address damage done to relationships of love and care in the process.
ISSN:1572-8447
Enthält:Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10677-019-09978-6