Paulus er ikke død - han lugter bare grimt: Den aksiale værdiomkalfatrings betydning for tidlig Kristusreligion

Through a discussion of Dostoevsky's depiction of the death of the staret in Brothers Karamazov, I discuss the olfactory channel of communication in religion with the aim in mind to tease apart the underlying ontology pertaining to different forms of religion. The focus is on impurity related t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Main Author: Klostergaard Petersen, Anders 1969- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Danish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Univ. [2019]
In: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Dostoevskij, Fëdor Michajlovič 1821-1881, Bratʹja Karamazovy / Death / Decomposition / The Holy / Smell / Greece (Antiquity) / Religion / Bible. Corinthians 2. 2,14-17
RelBib Classification:AG Religious life; material religion
BE Greco-Roman religions
HC New Testament
Further subjects:B Analogistic ontology
B Putrefaction
B Olfactory impurity
B Kosmos religion
B Paul as indexical putrefaction
B Axial tension
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Through a discussion of Dostoevsky's depiction of the death of the staret in Brothers Karamazov, I discuss the olfactory channel of communication in religion with the aim in mind to tease apart the underlying ontology pertaining to different forms of religion. The focus is on impurity related to putrefaction in death. Contrary to the understanding represented by the ironic voice of the narrator in Brothers Karamazov, I explore the view holding the saintly person to undergo an olfactory transformation in death changing into a pleasurable aroma and thereby becoming an indexical token of celestial life. From Brothers Karamazov, I proceed to examine notions of divine presence and olfactory tokens in ancient Graeco-Roman culture. I use it as a historical foil to analyse Paul's total inversion of the motif in 2 Cor 2, 14-17 and 4, 7-12 in which he portrays himself and his Christ-message as an indexical putrefaction of Christ. Thus, the title of my essay: "Paul isn't dead, he just smells funny." Finally, I discuss the extent to which such an understanding is encompassed by Philippe Descola's notion of analogistic ontology.
ISSN:1904-8181
Contains:Enthalten in: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.7146/rt.v0i69.112743