From Moses to Moses: Anthropomorphism and Divine Incorporeality in Maimonides's Guide and Mendelssohn's Bi'ur

Moses Mendelssohn, arguably the founding figure of modern Jewish philosophy, famously quipped that it was the hours of his youth spent studying the philosophical work of another Moses-Moses Maimonides-that left him with his famously crooked posture. This study investigates one important aspect of th...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Harvard theological review
Auteur principal: Sackson, Adrian (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press [2019]
Dans: Harvard theological review
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Maimonides, Moses 1135-1204, Dalālat al-ḥāʾirīn / Sefer Netivot ha-Schalom / Anthropomorphisme / Dieu
RelBib Classification:BH Judaïsme
NBC Dieu
TG Moyen Âge central
TJ Époque moderne
Sujets non-standardisés:B Biblical Exegesis
B Jewish Philosophy
B Moses Maimonides
B Moses Mendelssohn
B Anthropomorphism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Moses Mendelssohn, arguably the founding figure of modern Jewish philosophy, famously quipped that it was the hours of his youth spent studying the philosophical work of another Moses-Moses Maimonides-that left him with his famously crooked posture. This study investigates one important aspect of the relationship between Mendelssohn and Maimonides: their respective attitudes toward anthropomorphic language in the Bible. Much of the first part of Maimonides's Guide of the Perplexed is devoted to reinterpretation of scriptural language in light of Maimonides's non-anthropomorphic, incorporeal conception of God. These chapters constitute a central plank of Maimonides's religious agenda. Like Maimonides, Mendelssohn was both a philosopher and a religious Jew. His most extensive project intended for a Jewish audience was his German translation of the Pentateuch, accompanied by a Hebrew commentary, known as the Bi'ur. This study examines the manner in which Mendelssohn saw fit to interpret precisely the same set of biblical terms selected by Maimonides for philosophical reinterpretation. Through an investigation of Mendelssohn's approach to anthropomorphism, divine incorporeality, and philosophical reinterpretation in the biblical commentary, I hope to shed light on an important dimension of the nature of his engagement with Maimonides.
ISSN:1475-4517
Contient:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0017816019000063