Kenotic Gestures: Comparative Aesthetics and the Feminist Debate on Kenōsis
Christians sometimes take Christ's kenōsis, or self-emptying, as the pattern for Christian love of God and neighbor. Feminist critics suspect that this model reinforces unhealthy gender norms and oppressive power structures and contest the nature and extent of this template. Interreligious stud...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publishing Ltd
[2019]
|
In: |
Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
Year: 2019, Volume: 3, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 198-218 |
Further subjects: | B
Contemplation
B Love B Feminist Theology B Kenosis B bhakti rasa |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Christians sometimes take Christ's kenōsis, or self-emptying, as the pattern for Christian love of God and neighbor. Feminist critics suspect that this model reinforces unhealthy gender norms and oppressive power structures and contest the nature and extent of this template. Interreligious study can shed light on the debate. The Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition employs the categories of Indian aesthetic theory to explain how types of loving devotion (bhakti rasa) toward Krishna are evoked and expressed. The subordinate and peaceful modes of love for Krishna can serve as a heuristic for understanding Sarah Coakley's and Cynthia Bourgeault's retrievals of kenōsis in spiritual practice. A comparative reading suggests that objections to Coakley's version, which resembles the subordinate love of God, are more intractable due to the rootedness of its aesthetic in oppressive human experiences, while Bourgeault's reclamation of kenōsis aligns with a peaceful or meditative mode of love that feminists may more readily appreciate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2397-348X |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/isit.36643 |