Why Christian-Muslim 'Dialogue' is not always Dialogical
This paper questions the usefulness of contemporary Christian-Muslim dialogue by problematizing some of the underlying assumptions that dialogue partners make when they choose to engage in a specific, but altogether common, form of interfaith dialogue. Our critique of Christian-Muslim dialogue is ex...
| Published in: | Studies in interreligious dialogue |
|---|---|
| Authors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2018]
|
| In: |
Studies in interreligious dialogue
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Christianity
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Islam
|
| RelBib Classification: | AX Inter-religious relations BJ Islam CA Christianity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This paper questions the usefulness of contemporary Christian-Muslim dialogue by problematizing some of the underlying assumptions that dialogue partners make when they choose to engage in a specific, but altogether common, form of interfaith dialogue. Our critique of Christian-Muslim dialogue is expressed in four impediments which we contend undermine the very notion of dialogue and derail the process before it begins. This line of argument, to a large extent, relies on showing how the engagement of Christians and Muslims in interfaith dialogue is not always mutual, but is often shaped by a power differential that indirectly enables one side to control aspects of the dialogue in a way that effectively predetermines its outcome or defines what counts as dialogue to its advantage. This ensures that the dialogue ends up moving in a particular direction, namely one that reinforces Western liberal values, but ironically fails to produce a genuine dialogue between Muslims and Christians. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1806 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/SID.28.2.3285637 |