Ratnakīrti and the Extent of Inner Space: an Essay on Yogācāra and the Threat of Genuine Solipsism

Though perhaps a dubious honor, Dharmakīrti (fl. c. 550-650 C.E.) is the first philosopher in any tradition to explicitly recognize the epistemological threat of solipsism, devoting an entire essay to the problem-The Justification of (the very idea of) Other Minds (Santānāntarasiddhi). This essay re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sophia
Main Author: Kachru, Sonam (Author)
Contributors: Garfield, Jay L. 1955- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2019]
In: Sophia
RelBib Classification:BL Buddhism
TF Early Middle Ages
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
ZD Psychology
Further subjects:B Ratnakīrti
B Epistemology
B First-person
B Other beings
B Idealism
B Mind
B other minds
B Solipsism
B Xuanzang
B Yogācāra
B Dharmakīrti
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:Though perhaps a dubious honor, Dharmakīrti (fl. c. 550-650 C.E.) is the first philosopher in any tradition to explicitly recognize the epistemological threat of solipsism, devoting an entire essay to the problem-The Justification of (the very idea of) Other Minds (Santānāntarasiddhi). This essay revisits Ratnakīrti's (990-1050 C.E.) Doing Away with (A Justification of) Other Beings (Santānāntaraduṣaṇa) as a diagnosis of Dharmakīrti's attempt to reconstruct the very idea of other beings, with particular attention to Ratnakīrti's sensitivity to the conceptual preconditions for a genuine threat of solipsism. Along with the diagnosis of the conditions for the emergence of a problem of genuine solipsism, this essay takes as its focus Ratnakīrti's criticism of attempts to meet with the problem. In particular, I shall stress an insight Ratnakīrti adduces in the course of his diagnosis. Attempts to meet the problem of solipsism head on, Ratnakīrti shows us, obscure what the preconditions for a genuine problem reveal: the fact of our possessing two incommensurable conceptions of mind, one of which is intrinsically and entirely first-personal-in a sense to be clarified in the course of this essay-and the other not. I conclude this essay with an inconclusive sketch of the difficulties that remain when considering what Ratnakīrti would have us conclude from his own diagnosis.
ISSN:1873-930X
Reference:Kritik in "I Take Refuge in the Sangha. But how? The Puzzle of Intersubjectivity in Buddhist Philosophy Comments on Tzohar, Prueitt, and Kachru (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Sophia
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11841-019-0707-8