The Five Dimensions of Religiosity: Toward Demythologizing a Sacred Artifact

This paper addresses the issue of whether religiosity is really multidimensional as suggested by Glock and Stark and numerous other researchers. The "religiosity in 5-D" scales devised by Faulkner and DeJong (1966) to operationalize the Glock-Stark typology were completed by 873 students i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal for the scientific study of religion
Authors: Clayton, Richard R. 1941- (Author) ; Gladden, James W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [1974]
In: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Further subjects:B Datasets
B Statistical variance
B Factor analysis
B Demythologization
B Religious rituals
B Empirical Evidence
B College students
B Christianity
B Religiosity
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This paper addresses the issue of whether religiosity is really multidimensional as suggested by Glock and Stark and numerous other researchers. The "religiosity in 5-D" scales devised by Faulkner and DeJong (1966) to operationalize the Glock-Stark typology were completed by 873 students in 1967 and 656 students in 1970 at a small, private liberal-arts university in Florida. Each of the 5-D scales more than adequately met the minimum criteria of Guttman scaling in both data sets. The results of a factor analysis (varimax and oblique rotation) of the 23 items in both data sets indicated the predominance of the Ideological commitment factor which accounted for 78 and 83 percent of the common variance respectively. A second-order factor analysis confirmed the existence of one general factor. Our conclusion is that religiosity is not multidimensional.
ISSN:1468-5906
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/1384375