Trust, autonomy, and advance directives
Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who r...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1989]
|
In: |
Journal of religion and health
Jahr: 1989, Band: 28, Heft: 3, Seiten: 175-183 |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Central Place
B Advance Directive B Moral Experience B Salient Feature B Bioethical Discussion |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Zusammenfassung: | Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who receive such directives. The Brophy case is analyzed for its salient features, and a more central place for the concept of trust is proposed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00987749 |