Schreber's Memoirs: Myth or personal lamentation

Lucy Bregman's approach to Schreber'sMemoirs is scrutinized and found to be based on a number of fallacious and contradictory assumptions that call her interpretation of the book as personal religious myth into question. A social constructionist approach to mythology maintained by Berger a...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Church, Nathan (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V. [1979]
Dans: Journal of religion and health
Année: 1979, Volume: 18, Numéro: 4, Pages: 313-326
Sujets non-standardisés:B Social Constructionist
B General Relationship
B Alternative Interpretation
B Interpersonal Dynamic
B Constructionist Approach
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:Lucy Bregman's approach to Schreber'sMemoirs is scrutinized and found to be based on a number of fallacious and contradictory assumptions that call her interpretation of the book as personal religious myth into question. A social constructionist approach to mythology maintained by Berger and Luckmann is advanced, suggesting that at best Schreber's work qualifies as a quasi-mythical attempt to explain the source of his personal sociopsychic suffering. The family and interpersonal dynamics of Schreber's quasi-myth are investigated. Similarities to other cases of psychotic quasi-myths are noted and a general relationship between oppressive socialization and psychotic communications is advanced, as well as a specific alternative interpretation of Schreber's work to that proposed by Bregman.
ISSN:1573-6571
Référence:Kritik von "Religion and madness (1977)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/BF01533065