Schreber's Memoirs: Myth or personal lamentation
Lucy Bregman's approach to Schreber'sMemoirs is scrutinized and found to be based on a number of fallacious and contradictory assumptions that call her interpretation of the book as personal religious myth into question. A social constructionist approach to mythology maintained by Berger a...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1979]
|
Dans: |
Journal of religion and health
Année: 1979, Volume: 18, Numéro: 4, Pages: 313-326 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Social Constructionist
B General Relationship B Alternative Interpretation B Interpersonal Dynamic B Constructionist Approach |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | Lucy Bregman's approach to Schreber'sMemoirs is scrutinized and found to be based on a number of fallacious and contradictory assumptions that call her interpretation of the book as personal religious myth into question. A social constructionist approach to mythology maintained by Berger and Luckmann is advanced, suggesting that at best Schreber's work qualifies as a quasi-mythical attempt to explain the source of his personal sociopsychic suffering. The family and interpersonal dynamics of Schreber's quasi-myth are investigated. Similarities to other cases of psychotic quasi-myths are noted and a general relationship between oppressive socialization and psychotic communications is advanced, as well as a specific alternative interpretation of Schreber's work to that proposed by Bregman. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
Référence: | Kritik von "Religion and madness (1977)"
|
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF01533065 |