The Judicialization of Religious Freedom: An Institutionalist Approach
Recent years have seen growing interest in the judicialization of religious freedom (JRF). In this article, I identify two distinct meanings of JRF, which are often conflated but which need to be kept separate. I then argue for a stronger institutionalist approach to JRF. An institutionalist approac...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 514-530 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious freedom
/ Jurisdiction
/ Religious policy
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy XA Law |
Further subjects: | B
judicialization
B Religious Freedom B Institutions B Courts B venue shopping |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1669617726 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240409125737.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190723s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jssr.12532 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1669617726 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1669617726 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1125025050 |0 (DE-627)879339934 |0 (DE-576)420918027 |4 aut |a Mayrl, Damon |d 1977- | |
109 | |a Mayrl, Damon 1977- | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Judicialization of Religious Freedom |b An Institutionalist Approach |c Damon Mayrl |
264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Recent years have seen growing interest in the judicialization of religious freedom (JRF). In this article, I identify two distinct meanings of JRF, which are often conflated but which need to be kept separate. I then argue for a stronger institutionalist approach to JRF. An institutionalist approach focuses our attention on both the rules internal to courts, and the relationship of courts to administrative agencies, legislatures, and other governing bodies. I argue that there is room to strengthen our analyses of JRF by paying greater attention to these institutional dynamics. I demonstrate this by highlighting two overlooked features of courts-interpretive rules and access rules-that are particularly important for governing JRF; and by developing a framework that relates the courts to other institutional venues and political actors. In so doing, I identify a number of promising directions for future research into the causes and consequences of JRF. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Courts | |
650 | 4 | |a Institutions | |
650 | 4 | |a judicialization | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Freedom | |
650 | 4 | |a venue shopping | |
652 | |a AD:XA | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4125186-6 |0 (DE-627)105742090 |0 (DE-576)209574488 |2 gnd |a Religionsfreiheit |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |0 (DE-627)105812242 |0 (DE-576)209495456 |2 gnd |a Rechtsprechung |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049416-0 |0 (DE-627)106187104 |0 (DE-576)209081961 |2 gnd |a Religionspolitik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the scientific study of religion |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1961 |g 57(2018), 3, Seite 514-530 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634809 |w (DE-600)2024375-3 |w (DE-576)093888538 |x 1468-5906 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:57 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:514-530 |
856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jssr.12532 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free article)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jssr.12532 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12532 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
CAN | |a 1 | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3495774041 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1669617726 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200116124021 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Jurisdiction,Adjudication,Legal decision,Judgment,Finding,Religious freedom,Freedom of religion,Religious liberty,Religious policy,Church policy |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Jurisprudence,Jurisprudence,Liberté religieuse,Politique religieuse |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Jurisprudencia,Jurisprudencia,Libertad de religión,Política religiosa |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Giurisprudenza <motivo>,Giurisprudenza,Insieme delle sentenze,Insieme delle sentenze,Insieme delle sentenze (motivo),Insieme delle sentenze,Libertà di religione,Politiche religiose |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 司法判决,裁定,宗教政策,宗教自由,信教自由 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 司法判決,裁定,宗教政策,宗教自由,信教自由 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Jurisprudência,Jurisprudência,Liberdade de religião,Política religiosa |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религиозная политика,Свобода вероисповедания,Судопроизводство (мотив),Судопроизводство |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θρησκευτική ελευθερία,Θρησκευτική πολιτική,Νομολογία (μοτίβο),Νομολογία |
SUB | |a CAN |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religiöse Freiheit , Judikatur,Spruchpraxis |