Response to Bakan's and Witztum's Commentaries
David Bakan's (1966) distinctions between agency and communion are two relational categories that correspond in many ways to my differentiation be- tween emanation and contraction. By drawing on Max Weber's formulations, both of us trace Western controlling patterns of communication or sex...
| Published in: | The international journal for the psychology of religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[1995]
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1995, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 255-258 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | David Bakan's (1966) distinctions between agency and communion are two relational categories that correspond in many ways to my differentiation be- tween emanation and contraction. By drawing on Max Weber's formulations, both of us trace Western controlling patterns of communication or sexuality to the Protestant egocentric salvation ethic. By using Eli Witztum's clinical observations as a constructive critical impetus, the promising psycho- therapeutic potential inherent in the broad yetzer-yetzira paradigm is then briefly discussed in terms of its possible contribution to an egalitarian and spiritual model of sexuality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Response to Rotenberg's 'Cabalistic Sexuality and Creativity' (1995)"
Kritik von "Commentary on Rotenberg's 'Cabalic Sexuality and Creativity' (1995)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0504_4 |