A Reply to John P. Dourley
Dourley's claim that Jung exclusively located all transcendent experiences within the psyche is only partially correct. I contend that Jung intentionally rode the fence on the topic of God's external reality. In his work on flying saucers, Jung disqualified himself on extrapsychic matters....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[1995]
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1995, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 91-94 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | Dourley's claim that Jung exclusively located all transcendent experiences within the psyche is only partially correct. I contend that Jung intentionally rode the fence on the topic of God's external reality. In his work on flying saucers, Jung disqualified himself on extrapsychic matters. Although Jung felt traditional dogma to be inadequate, he may have been less sure about the divinity to which dogma referred. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "The Religious Significance of Jung's Psychology (1995)"
Kritik in "Response to Bock and Coward (1995)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0502_2 |