The Biology of God or the Psychology of God?: a Response to David Hay

Hay's article, The Biology of God, covers a vast amount of bibliographical survey; yet it seemingly lacks some detailed analysis of those works. Methodologically there is no clarity regarding the typologies of religious experience with which he deals. This response raises these methodological i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The international journal for the psychology of religion
Main Author: Nieto, José C. 1929-2016 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group [1994]
In: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:Hay's article, The Biology of God, covers a vast amount of bibliographical survey; yet it seemingly lacks some detailed analysis of those works. Methodologically there is no clarity regarding the typologies of religious experience with which he deals. This response raises these methodological issues, pointing as well to some fundamental bibliographical gaps. It questions also whether a psychology rather than a biology of God would not be a better phenomenological description.
ISSN:1532-7582
Reference:Kritik von "'The Biology of God' (1994)"
Contains:Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0401_3