Religion and Prejudice: Lessons Not Learned From the Past
Altemeyer and Hunsberger (1992) analyzed fundamentalism and prejudice. Unfortunately, their article failed to provide data on several issues that past literature has established as crucial. The use of denominational affiliation, the failure to include intrinsic and extrinsic scales, and the failure...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[1993]
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1993, Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-31 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | Altemeyer and Hunsberger (1992) analyzed fundamentalism and prejudice. Unfortunately, their article failed to provide data on several issues that past literature has established as crucial. The use of denominational affiliation, the failure to include intrinsic and extrinsic scales, and the failure to recognize the interaction of different value positions among Christian groups with other religious variables limits the interpretability of the results and thus the major conclusions that the authors attempt to draw. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1532-7582 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Reply to Gorsuch (1993)"
Kritik von "Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice (1992)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0301_4 |