Beyond Hume: Demea a rehabilitation with systematic intent
Traditionally, Demea is considered to be the weakest character in Hume's famous Dialogues concerning Natural Religion; the stage is completely dominated by Cleanthes' optimistic theism and by Philo's skeptical critical manoeuvres against that. Contrary to this traditional approach, ho...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2019]
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 86, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-84 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hume, David 1711-1776, Dialogues concerning natural religion
/ Cosmological proof of God's existence
/ Theodicy
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
critique of religion
B David Hume B Theism B D.Z. Phillips B Analogical arguments B Orthodoxy B A defense of Demea |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1670230597 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240409125631.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190730s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-019-09711-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1670230597 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1670230597 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)141626003 |0 (DE-627)630395322 |0 (DE-576)325026289 |4 aut |a Sass, Hartmut von |d 1980- | |
109 | |a Sass, Hartmut von 1980- |a Sass, H. von 1980- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Beyond Hume |b Demea a rehabilitation with systematic intent |c Hartmut von Sass |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Traditionally, Demea is considered to be the weakest character in Hume's famous Dialogues concerning Natural Religion; the stage is completely dominated by Cleanthes' optimistic theism and by Philo's skeptical critical manoeuvres against that. Contrary to this traditional approach, however, the 'orthodox' Demea will be defended here by maintaining that Demea contributes-though neither consciously intended nor recognized by Hume-the most interesting observations concerning religious belief. He points to a position lying beyond the metaphysical fantasies of theism (in league with its successors, the "friends of Cleanthes") on the one hand and Philo's destructiveness, which seems to amount to a moralized minimal version of faith on the other. It will be clear that this defense is not exegetically orientated, but rather reacts to a constellation personalized in Hume's 'casting' that lets us see on which topics we shall continue to work theologically as well as philosophically today. Accordingly, a conceptual critique of Cleanthes and Philo will be elaborated, using three concrete examples to show what religious belief lying beyond metaphysical hopes that explain God as a (quasi)person, as well as reductionist concessions that regard 'God' merely as an expression of a moral attitude, could look like. Thus Demea represents a 'postmetaphysical' image of religious belief-and, eventually, we are invited to belong to the "friends of Demea". | ||
601 | |a Rehabilitation | ||
601 | |a Systematik | ||
650 | 4 | |a A defense of Demea | |
650 | 4 | |a Analogical arguments | |
650 | 4 | |a critique of religion | |
650 | 4 | |a D.Z. Phillips | |
650 | 4 | |a David Hume | |
650 | 4 | |a Orthodoxy | |
650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
652 | |a AB:NBC:VA | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4282346-8 |0 (DE-627)10435481X |0 (DE-576)210775343 |a Hume, David |2 gnd |d 1711-1776 |t Dialogues concerning natural religion |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4165372-5 |0 (DE-627)105440604 |0 (DE-576)209894989 |2 gnd |a Kosmologischer Gottesbeweis |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059740-4 |0 (DE-627)104589558 |0 (DE-576)209132027 |2 gnd |a Theodizee |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 86(2019), 1, Seite 61-84 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:86 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:61-84 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09711-4 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3500830021 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1670230597 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200826172234 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmological proof of God's existence,Cosmological argument,God's existence,Theodicy,Theodicy |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Preuve cosmologique de l’existence de Dieu,Argument cosmologique,Argument cosmologique,Théodicée,Théodicée |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Prueba cosmológica de la existencia de Dios,Teodicea,Teodicea |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Prova cosmologica dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento cosmologico,Argomento cosmologico,Teodicea,Teodicea |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论,神存在的宇宙论论证,上帝存在的宇宙论论证 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神存在的宇宙論論証,上帝存在的宇宙論論証,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Prova cosmológica da existência de Deus,Teodiceia,Teodiceia |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Космологическое доказательство бытия Бога,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Κοσμολογική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Hume, David,1711-1776,Gespräche über natürliche Religion,Hume, David,1711-1776,Dialoge über natürliche Religion,Hume, David,1711-1776,Dialogues concerning natural religion in focus , Kosmologisches Argument |