Disagreement, Deep Time, and Progress in Philosophy
The epistemology of disagreement examines the question of how an agent ought to respond to awareness of epistemic peer disagreement about one of her beliefs. The literature on this topic, ironically enough, represents widespread disagreement about how we should respond to disagreement. I argue for t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2019, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 285-313 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Cognition theory
/ Argument
/ Contradiction
/ Scepticism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
progress in philosophy
B peer disagreement B widespread disagreement B deep time |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1684115167 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200616174857.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191203s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-20191358 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1684115167 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1684115167 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1080701206 |0 (DE-627)845041444 |0 (DE-576)453726771 |4 aut |a Lougheed, Kirk | |
| 109 | |a Lougheed, Kirk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disagreement, Deep Time, and Progress in Philosophy |c Kirk Lougheed |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The epistemology of disagreement examines the question of how an agent ought to respond to awareness of epistemic peer disagreement about one of her beliefs. The literature on this topic, ironically enough, represents widespread disagreement about how we should respond to disagreement. I argue for the sceptical conclusion that the existence of widespread disagreement throughout the history of philosophy, and right up until the present day indicates that philosophers are highly unreliable at arriving at the truth. If truth convergence indicates progress in a field, then there is little progress in philosophy. This sceptical conclusion, however, need not make us give up philosophizing: That we should currently be sceptical of our philosophical beliefs is a contingent fact. We are an intellectually immature species and given the existence of the deep future we have some reason to think that there will be truth-convergence in philosophy in the future. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a deep time | |
| 650 | 4 | |a peer disagreement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a progress in philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a widespread disagreement | |
| 652 | |a AB:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |0 (DE-627)106099086 |0 (DE-576)209182261 |2 gnd |a Erkenntnistheorie |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4273545-2 |0 (DE-627)104478098 |0 (DE-576)210699469 |2 gnd |a Argument |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4189802-3 |0 (DE-627)105254460 |0 (DE-576)210062304 |2 gnd |a Widerspruch |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 9(2019), 4, Seite 285-313 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:285-313 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/9/4/article-p285_285.xml |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-20191358 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 9 |j 2019 |e 4 |h 285-313 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3556029855 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1684115167 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200616174857 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191203||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Cognition theory,Epistemology,Theory of knowledge,Knowledge,Contradiction,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argument,Contradiction,Scepticisme,Théorie de la connaissance,Épistémologie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Contradicción,Epistemología,Escepticismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomento,Contraddizione,Epistemologia,Teoria epistemiologica,Teoria epistemiologica,Scetticismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 异议,矛盾,抗议,怀疑主义,怀疑论,知识论,认识论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,異議,矛盾,抗議,知識論,認識論,逻辑论证 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento,Ceticismo,Contradição,Epistemologia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргумент,Противоречие,Скептицизм,Теория познания |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αντίφαση,Αντιλογία,Γνωσιολογία,Γνωσιοθεωρία,Επιστημολογία,Επιχείρημα,Σκεπτικισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie,Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnislehre,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie , Skepsis,Skeptik |