REDRUM
This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated
| Veröffentlicht in: | Method & theory in the study of religion |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik AE Religionspsychologie CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Christianity
B Blood |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will (2019)"
Kritik von "Why I am Such a Good Christian (2019)" Kritik von "Disfiguring Christianity (2019)" Kritik von "Food for Thought (2019)" Kritik von "Christianity (2019)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341446 |