REDRUM

This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Method & theory in the study of religion
Main Author: Anidjar, Gil 1964- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill [2019]
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
CB Christian life; spirituality
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Christianity
B Blood
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated
ISSN:1570-0682
Reference:Kritik von "Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will (2019)"
Kritik von "Why I am Such a Good Christian (2019)"
Kritik von "Disfiguring Christianity (2019)"
Kritik von "Food for Thought (2019)"
Kritik von "Christianity (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341446