REDRUM
This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 304-308 |
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AE Psychology of religion CB Christian life; spirituality VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Christianity
B Blood |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will (2019)"
Kritik von "Why I am Such a Good Christian (2019)" Kritik von "Disfiguring Christianity (2019)" Kritik von "Food for Thought (2019)" Kritik von "Christianity (2019)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341446 |