REDRUM
This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated
| Publié dans: | Method & theory in the study of religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AD Sociologie des religions AE Psychologie de la religion CB Spiritualité chrétienne VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Christianity
B Blood |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This essay is a response to readers and discussants with regard to Blood and to the limits and origins of Christianity. Deploying the Derridean idiom of mark and context, the singularity of blood in Christianity, of Christianity in its relation to blood, is what is here reiterated |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will (2019)"
Kritik von "Why I am Such a Good Christian (2019)" Kritik von "Disfiguring Christianity (2019)" Kritik von "Food for Thought (2019)" Kritik von "Christianity (2019)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341446 |