Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona's New Historiographical Approach
Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in t...
Published in: | Perichoresis |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sciendo, De Gruyter
[2019]
|
In: |
Perichoresis
|
RelBib Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDG Free church NAB Fundamental theology VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Presuppositionalism
B Carl F. H. Henry B Michael R. Licona B Methodology B EVIDENTIALISM |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona's new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona's evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry's presuppositional approach. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2284-7308 |
Reference: | Kritik in "On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s "New Historiographical Approach" (2021)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Perichoresis
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/perc-2019-0021 |