Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics: A Henrecian Response to Michael Licona's New Historiographical Approach

Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perichoresis
Main Author: Roach, William C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sciendo, De Gruyter [2019]
In: Perichoresis
RelBib Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDG Free church
NAB Fundamental theology
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Presuppositionalism
B Carl F. H. Henry
B Michael R. Licona
B Methodology
B EVIDENTIALISM
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Two cross-currents from the twentieth century have affected evangelical apologetics: apologetic methodology and Carl F. H. Henry. Henry was considered the dean of American evangelicalism, who shaped the movement by providing a rational and propositional apologetic. Henry also engaged the issues in the midst of a larger question of apologetic methodology, primarily, between presuppositionalists and evidentialists. This article continues to address the two cross-currents by offering a Henrecian evaluation of Michael Licona's new historiographical approach to defending the resurrection. In particular, the article attempts to evaluate Licona's evidentialist approach through the lens of Henry's presuppositional approach.
ISSN:2284-7308
Reference:Kritik in "On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s "New Historiographical Approach" (2021)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Perichoresis
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2478/perc-2019-0021