The Falsification Challenge
Not too many years ago Antony Flew voiced a challenge. His challenge was directed to religious believers and it was this: What would have to occur or to have occurred to constitute for you a disproof of the love of, or of the existence of, God?' It was Flew's implicit argument that unless...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1969]
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 1969, Volume: 5, Numéro: 1, Pages: 69-76 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Not too many years ago Antony Flew voiced a challenge. His challenge was directed to religious believers and it was this: What would have to occur or to have occurred to constitute for you a disproof of the love of, or of the existence of, God?' It was Flew's implicit argument that unless such a challenge could be met an utterance like There is a God' in fact denied nothing and so asserted nothing either (since the meaning of an assertion is the negation of its denial). One great merit of Flew's challenge was that it crystallised a malaise felt by many into a hard, pointed question. As a challenge this question elicited two basic reactions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Référence: | Kritik in "The Falsification Response (1969)"
Kritik in "The Falsification Challenge (1969)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500003966 |