Universal Salvation: A Reply to Mr Bettis
In his article 'A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation', J. D. Bettis criticises the argument that all men will be saved because God's love is both absolutely good and absolutely sovereign' (p. 330). I would like to argue that either some of Bettis's criticisms...
| Published in: | Religious studies |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1971]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In his article 'A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation', J. D. Bettis criticises the argument that all men will be saved because God's love is both absolutely good and absolutely sovereign' (p. 330). I would like to argue that either some of Bettis's criticisms are confused, or else that he is not using love' in anything like its ordinary sense. I will not attempt a full defence of universalism here, however. In particular, I will not try to defend it against the sort of criticisms Bettis says an Arminian might raise (p. 336). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation (1970)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500002080 |