Irreducible Religious Metaphors

A characteristic feature of religious discourse is its tendency to use expressions which are not only metaphorical but ‘irreducibly 'metaphorical', that is to say, which have no literal equivalent. Sophisticated believers freely point out theology's tendency toward the ‘symbolical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religious studies
Main Author: Burgess, Andrew J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1972]
In: Religious studies
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:A characteristic feature of religious discourse is its tendency to use expressions which are not only metaphorical but ‘irreducibly 'metaphorical', that is to say, which have no literal equivalent. Sophisticated believers freely point out theology's tendency toward the ‘symbolical', ‘analogical', or ‘'mysterious'; while equally sophisticated sceptics complain that faith is ‘'anthropomorphic' or ‘merely 'poetic'. When this discussion between believers and seeptics is confronted with what we may call the ‘reducibility thesis', that metaphors should be reducible to literal statements, a philosophical puzzle results: religious metaphors should be reducible, but they are not.
ISSN:1469-901X
Contains:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500006120