Winch and Wittgenstein

In this paper, I shall be concerned to show: (1) that Winch believes that there can be different conceptions of ‘agreement with reality'; (2) that Wittgenstein agrees with this, but emphasizes the difficulty of understanding such conceptions; (3) that Winch realizes this difficulty, and yet sti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Almond, Philip C. 1950- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1976]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1976, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 473-482
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In this paper, I shall be concerned to show: (1) that Winch believes that there can be different conceptions of ‘agreement with reality'; (2) that Wittgenstein agrees with this, but emphasizes the difficulty of understanding such conceptions; (3) that Winch realizes this difficulty, and yet still tries to gain understanding of primitive social institutions in terms of their sense of the significance of human life, in terms of the limiting notions of birth, death and sexual relations; (4) that such a notion of the significance of human life cannot be made sense of without an understanding of the concept of agreement with reality which undergirds it; (5) that Winch's position is internally incoherent.
ISSN:1469-901X
Contains:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500009616