Confronting suffering with narrative theory, constructed selfhood, and control: Critical perspectives by Simone Weil and Buddhist metaphysics
According to the narrative approach, illness and suffering are disruptions that test our ability to retell and govern ourselves. For instance, Arthur Frank and Rita Charon argue that it is via narratives, "selves," and control that the challenges of illness and affliction can be met. The a...
| Publié dans: | Journal of disability & religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
| Dans: |
Journal of disability & religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 23, Numéro: 3, Pages: 227-250 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Disability
B Spirituality B Buddhism B Suffering |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | According to the narrative approach, illness and suffering are disruptions that test our ability to retell and govern ourselves. For instance, Arthur Frank and Rita Charon argue that it is via narratives, "selves," and control that the challenges of illness and affliction can be met. The author explores this approach in light of Simone Weil's philosophy and Zen Buddhist thought, both of which question the primacy of selfhood, control, and discourse. Using disability as a case study, the author argues that both Weil and Zen Buddhist philosophy offer a radical alternative to narrative ethics, worthy of further scrutiny. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2331-253X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of disability & religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/23312521.2019.1567296 |