Power, ideology, and women's ordination: Discursive strategies in three Roman Catholic documents

This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical research on religion
Authors: Kim, Eun-Young Julia (Author) ; Matiko, Beverly J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage [2019]
In: Critical research on religion
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Inter insigniores / Johannes Paul, II., Pope 1920-2005, Ordinatio sacerdotalis / Catholic church / Woman / Ordination / Gender-specific role / Power / Hierarchy
RelBib Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
CH Christianity and Society
KDB Roman Catholic Church
Further subjects:B Women's Ordination
B Critical Discourse Analysis
B Catholic Church
B Women priests
B Inter Insigniores
B Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional discourse framework, we examine the ideological message embedded in the linguistic features and the role each text plays within a matrix of power relations. Through close readings of Inter Insigniores: On the Question of Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II, and Women and the Priesthood, we demonstrate how discourse analysis can serve as a useful tool for identifying logical fallacies, inconsistencies, dilemmas, and manipulative tactics in religious discourses.
ISSN:2050-3040
Contains:Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/2050303219874375