On Why Gaita Doesn't Describe Eichmann as Sacred
In this article we examine a potentialproblem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arisesfrom the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2014]
|
| In: |
Implicit religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Pages: 85-98 |
| Further subjects: | B
EICHMANN, Adolf, 1906-1962
B Sacredness B Eichmann B GOOD & Evil: An Absolute Conception (Book) B GOOD & evil B Religious B GAITA, Raimond, 1946- B Gaita B Sacred |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In this article we examine a potentialproblem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arisesfrom the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue that the tension in Gaita sposition does not in reality amount to a contradiction, and so we defuse the potential problem. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1697 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Implicit religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/imre.v17i2.197 |
