Let's get physical: The Ethology of Religious Submissions and Intimidations

The consensus in philosophical and scientific circles is that physicalism is the most warranted position to adopt. With respect to the academic study of religion, physicalism underwrites two complementary approaches, one widely recognized and the other underappreciated in the field at large. While t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ellis, Thomas B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Equinox Publishing [2017]
In: Body and religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 1, Issue: 2, Pages: 148-168
Further subjects:B Ethology
B non-natural agents
B Ritual
B Physicalism
B submission
B intimidation
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The consensus in philosophical and scientific circles is that physicalism is the most warranted position to adopt. With respect to the academic study of religion, physicalism underwrites two complementary approaches, one widely recognized and the other underappreciated in the field at large. While the cognitive science of religion (CSR) enjoys widespread recognition, the ethology of religion does not. This paper employs ethology to explain two submissive behaviours ritual practitioners often perform, that is, ocular aversion and rump presentation. Significantly, the means of submission reflect the practitioner's perceptions of the intimidating agents', e.g., deities', organ of intimidation. As it is in the animal kingdom, so too in the religious imagination, dominant others, especially males, will use their eyes or their phalluses to intimidate.
ISSN:2057-5831
Contains:Enthalten in: Body and religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/bar.33438