Can eternity be saved?: A comment on Stump and Rogers
Eleonore Stump and Katherin Rogers have recently defended the doctrine of divine timelessness in separate essays, arguing that the doctrine is consistent with libertarian free will and that timeless divine knowledge is providentially useful. I show that their defenses do not succeed; a doctrine of e...
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2020]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2020, Band: 87, Heft: 2, Seiten: 137-148 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Stump, Eleonore 1947-
/ Rogers, Katherin A. 195X-
/ Unendlichkeit Gottes
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Providence
B Rogers B Eternity B Timelessness B Foreknowledge B Stump |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Eleonore Stump and Katherin Rogers have recently defended the doctrine of divine timelessness in separate essays, arguing that the doctrine is consistent with libertarian free will and that timeless divine knowledge is providentially useful. I show that their defenses do not succeed; a doctrine of eternity having these features cannot be saved. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09719-w |