A Reply to Wielenberg on a Timeless First Cause

Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward three further criticisms of the view that God is temporal since the moment of creation. It is seen that these criticisms are misconceived and do not take cognizance of what I have written elsewhere.

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:TheoLogica
Main Author: Craig, William Lane 1949- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain [2021]
In: TheoLogica
RelBib Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NBD Doctrine of Creation
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Singularity
B God and time
B Creation
B Divine eternity
B Timelessness
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward three further criticisms of the view that God is temporal since the moment of creation. It is seen that these criticisms are misconceived and do not take cognizance of what I have written elsewhere.
ISSN:2593-0265
Reference:Kritik von "A Temporal First Cause? (2021)"
Contains:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i1.60693