Can eternity be saved?: A comment on Stump and Rogers
Eleonore Stump and Katherin Rogers have recently defended the doctrine of divine timelessness in separate essays, arguing that the doctrine is consistent with libertarian free will and that timeless divine knowledge is providentially useful. I show that their defenses do not succeed; a doctrine of e...
| Publié dans: | International journal for philosophy of religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 87, Numéro: 2, Pages: 137-148 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Stump, Eleonore 1947-
/ Rogers, Katherin A. 195X-
/ Infinité de Dieu
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Providence
B Rogers B Eternity B Timelessness B Foreknowledge B Stump |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Eleonore Stump and Katherin Rogers have recently defended the doctrine of divine timelessness in separate essays, arguing that the doctrine is consistent with libertarian free will and that timeless divine knowledge is providentially useful. I show that their defenses do not succeed; a doctrine of eternity having these features cannot be saved. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-019-09719-w |