Robert C. Neville: A Systematic, Nonconformist, Comparative Philosopher of Religion
Neville's comparative study of religion cannot be neatly categorized into current divisions of human knowledge of religion. Its comparative method of vague categories remains hospitable to varying scholarly interests. With the help of this methodology, Neville contributes in a sui generis fashi...
| Published in: | American journal of theology & philosophy |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Illinois Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
American journal of theology & philosophy
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations BM Chinese universism; Confucianism; Taoism CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations TK Recent history |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Neville's comparative study of religion cannot be neatly categorized into current divisions of human knowledge of religion. Its comparative method of vague categories remains hospitable to varying scholarly interests. With the help of this methodology, Neville contributes in a sui generis fashion to the Christian-Ru transcendence debate. An analysis of these three aspects of Neville's work supports reflection upon the nature and future of comparative study of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2156-4795 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "A Response to the End of the Bob Era (2019)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: American journal of theology & philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5406/amerjtheophil.40.3.0011 |