La non credenza incolpevole: Una risorsa per i credenti?
John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be though...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Rassegna di teologia
Year: 2019, Volume: 60, Issue: 4, Pages: 549-567 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Summary: | John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be thought of as culpable; consequently, God does not exist. The author shows that this argument is only seemingly beneficial to unbelievers and detrimental to believers. On the contrary, at a closer inspection, it is seemingly detrimental to unbelievers and ultimately beneficial to believers. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0033-9644 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Rassegna di teologia
|
