La non credenza incolpevole: Una risorsa per i credenti?
John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be though...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Italienisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Ed. A. V. E.
[2019]
|
In: |
Rassegna di teologia
Jahr: 2019, Band: 60, Heft: 4, Seiten: 549-567 |
RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus NBC Gotteslehre |
Zusammenfassung: | John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be thought of as culpable; consequently, God does not exist. The author shows that this argument is only seemingly beneficial to unbelievers and detrimental to believers. On the contrary, at a closer inspection, it is seemingly detrimental to unbelievers and ultimately beneficial to believers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-9644 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Rassegna di teologia
|