Tensions in the Paradigm of Environmental Economics: An Analysis Inspired by Dooyeweerd's Philosophy
This article critically analyzes the environmental economics paradigm of David Pearce and Robert Kerry Turner. Our analysis is inspired by the philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd, in particular his transcendental criticism and theory of modalities. We describe how Pearce and Turner theorize the concept...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2020, Volume: 85, Issue: 1, Pages: 66-88 |
RelBib Classification: | NCE Business ethics NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
willingness to pay
B transcendental criticism B environmental economics B homo economicus B theory of modalities B considered preferences B evocative argumentation |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This article critically analyzes the environmental economics paradigm of David Pearce and Robert Kerry Turner. Our analysis is inspired by the philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd, in particular his transcendental criticism and theory of modalities. We describe how Pearce and Turner theorize the concept of sustainable development. On the basis of this description we identify immanent tensions in their approach and analyze to what extent these tensions are caused by implicit normative presuppositions in the key concepts used by Pearce and Turner. Finally, we examine whether Dooyeweerd's conception of the economic aspect can diminish these tensions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophia reformata
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/23528230-08501007 |