Interpreting Religion: The Case of Jihad
Scholars of religion and western Muslims have been accused of glossing over the aggressive interpretation of jihad in Islam in order to make the religion more palatable to a western audience. This paper argues that the accusation is based on a narrow understanding of the available hermeneutical stra...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
AASR
[2009]
|
In: |
Australian religion studies review
Year: 2009, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-12 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | Scholars of religion and western Muslims have been accused of glossing over the aggressive interpretation of jihad in Islam in order to make the religion more palatable to a western audience. This paper argues that the accusation is based on a narrow understanding of the available hermeneutical strategies and, by exploring some of the interpretative tradition, highlights the point that religions are rich reservoirs of meaning developed in multiple contexts. As living traditions religions can, and do, call on different meanings from this reservoir. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1744-9014 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Australian religion studies review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/arsr.v22i1.3 |