Concepts of legitimacy: congruence and divergence in the Afghan conflict
Revisiting the US-led counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan, we examine to what extent the concepts of legitimacy of the Taliban and the US counterinsurgents showed congruence with pre-existing Afghan notions of legitimacy. We move beyond dominant approaches of social contract theory and materia...
| Published in: | Civil wars |
|---|---|
| Authors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2020
|
| In: |
Civil wars
|
| Further subjects: | B
Legitimation
B Afghanistan B Usa B Conflict of interests B Intervention International law B Ethnische Probleme / Nationalitätenprobleme B national group issues / Ethnic B Post-war period B Effects B Warfare B Internal policy B Niederschlagung Politics B Conflict B Political system B Legitimacy |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | Revisiting the US-led counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan, we examine to what extent the concepts of legitimacy of the Taliban and the US counterinsurgents showed congruence with pre-existing Afghan notions of legitimacy. We move beyond dominant approaches of social contract theory and materialist legitimacy by using a threefold model of legitimacy to assess the different concepts of legitimacy. Both the Taliban and the US, we argue, diverged markedly from historically developed notions of legitimate rule. The article demonstrates that counterinsurgents need to be aware of and adapt to local norms. Moreover, we point towards relevant norms in the case of Afghanistan. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Literaturverzeichnis Seite 21-25 |
| ISSN: | 1743-968X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Civil wars
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13698249.2020.1686876 |