Heterodox Hegels: heresiology in de Lubac and Bulgakov
This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac&...
| Published in: | Scottish journal of theology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Reception
/ Bulgakov, Sergii N. 1871-1944
/ Lubac, Henri de 1896-1991
/ Criticism
/ Heresy
/ Joachimism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
Henri de Lubac
B G. W. F. Hegel B heresiology B Sergius Bulgakov |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac's heresiological critique has proven more influential, I commend Bulgakov's. The paper concludes by querying the very strategy of assaying philosophers like Hegel heresiologically. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061900070X |