God and Gratuitous Evil: A Response to Klaas Kraay
In Chapter 3 of this volume, Klaas Kraay presented a critique of William Hasker's necessity-of-gratuitous-evil defense against the evidential problem of evil (the NGE defense). Hasker's response here in Chapter 4 contends that the defense survives all of Kraay's objections. Most impor...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
Oxford studies in philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 9, Pages: 54-67 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Evil
/ Existence of God
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Summary: | In Chapter 3 of this volume, Klaas Kraay presented a critique of William Hasker's necessity-of-gratuitous-evil defense against the evidential problem of evil (the NGE defense). Hasker's response here in Chapter 4 contends that the defense survives all of Kraay's objections. Most important of these objections is the contention that there is far too much gratuitous evil to be accounted for by Hasker's defense. |
|---|---|
| Reference: | Kritik von "Theism, Pro-Theism, Hasker, and Gratuitous Evil (2019)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Oxford studies in philosophy of religion
|