Approaching Laestadianism as an insider researcher
In this article, I discuss my experiences of being an insider researching Laestadianism. I present my research, noting the advantages and disadvantages, ending with a conclusion in which I refer to the discussion among anthropologists and ethnologists, especially in the study of religion. The outcom...
| Published in: | Approaching religion |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
[2020]
|
| In: |
Approaching religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 40–54 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Laestadians
/ Science of Religion
/ Religious studies scholar
/ Ingroup
/ Fremdgruppe
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy KBE Northern Europe; Scandinavia KDH Christian sects |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In this article, I discuss my experiences of being an insider researching Laestadianism. I present my research, noting the advantages and disadvantages, ending with a conclusion in which I refer to the discussion among anthropologists and ethnologists, especially in the study of religion. The outcome is that even though the distinction insider-outsider researcher is complicated, both insider and outsider researchers will improve the research, contributing to its nuanced presentation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1799-3121 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Approaching religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30664/ar.85998 |