Approaching Laestadianism as an insider researcher
In this article, I discuss my experiences of being an insider researching Laestadianism. I present my research, noting the advantages and disadvantages, ending with a conclusion in which I refer to the discussion among anthropologists and ethnologists, especially in the study of religion. The outcom...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Approaching religion
Année: 2020, Volume: 10, Numéro: 1, Pages: 40–54 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Læstadiens
/ Science des religions
/ Spécialiste de science des religions
/ Ingroup
/ Fremdgruppe
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions KBE Scandinavie KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In this article, I discuss my experiences of being an insider researching Laestadianism. I present my research, noting the advantages and disadvantages, ending with a conclusion in which I refer to the discussion among anthropologists and ethnologists, especially in the study of religion. The outcome is that even though the distinction insider-outsider researcher is complicated, both insider and outsider researchers will improve the research, contributing to its nuanced presentation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1799-3121 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Approaching religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30664/ar.85998 |