Humanist Limits in the Material Phenomenology of Religion
This article tracks a shared methodological tension within the work of a few classic phenomenologists, based on an epistemological juxtaposition at the heart of their enquiry. This epistemological tension emerges as secular and non-secular concepts are worked with concurrently. A modified form of th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-23 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Chidester, David 1952-
/ Phenomenology of religion
/ Materialism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
Phenomenology
B Epistemology B reducibility B Religion B Science B Humanism B Systems B contact zones B Materialism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This article tracks a shared methodological tension within the work of a few classic phenomenologists, based on an epistemological juxtaposition at the heart of their enquiry. This epistemological tension emerges as secular and non-secular concepts are worked with concurrently. A modified form of this tension is present in the materialist phenomenology of religion that David Chidester presents, which links his phenomenology to the earlier classical forms. However, although a methodological tension is maintained in his work, the epistemological juxtaposition that initiated the tension is collapsed along humanist boundaries, with important consequences for the study of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2413-3027 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17159/2413-3027/2019/v32n2a3 |
