Humanist Limits in the Material Phenomenology of Religion
This article tracks a shared methodological tension within the work of a few classic phenomenologists, based on an epistemological juxtaposition at the heart of their enquiry. This epistemological tension emerges as secular and non-secular concepts are worked with concurrently. A modified form of th...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Journal for the study of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 1-23 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Chidester, David 1952-
/ Phénoménologie des religions
/ Matérialisme
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AB Philosophie de la religion |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Phenomenology
B Epistemology B reducibility B Religion B Science B Humanism B Systems B contact zones B Materialism |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | This article tracks a shared methodological tension within the work of a few classic phenomenologists, based on an epistemological juxtaposition at the heart of their enquiry. This epistemological tension emerges as secular and non-secular concepts are worked with concurrently. A modified form of this tension is present in the materialist phenomenology of religion that David Chidester presents, which links his phenomenology to the earlier classical forms. However, although a methodological tension is maintained in his work, the epistemological juxtaposition that initiated the tension is collapsed along humanist boundaries, with important consequences for the study of religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2413-3027 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17159/2413-3027/2019/v32n2a3 |