Revelation and the Unity of the Truth
In his assessment of Paul Tillichs theology, Dirk Martin Grube states that revelation pertains to knowledge about knowledge instead of knowledge about the world. This concept of revelation raises two interrelated questions: 1) Can revelation be restricted to an epistemological metalevel without conv...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
In: |
NTT
Year: 2020, Volume: 74, Issue: 2, Pages: 123-137 |
Review of: | Offenbarung, absolute Wahrheit und interreligiöser Dialog (Berlin : De Gruyter, 2019) (Belt, Henk van den)
|
RelBib Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NBB Doctrine of Revelation NBF Christology VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
B propositional truth B Dirk-Martin Grube B Revelation B faith and science B Paul Tillich B historicity of the resurrection |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | In his assessment of Paul Tillichs theology, Dirk Martin Grube states that revelation pertains to knowledge about knowledge instead of knowledge about the world. This concept of revelation raises two interrelated questions: 1) Can revelation be restricted to an epistemological metalevel without conveying propositional content?; 2) Does knowledge based on revelation potentially conflict with other forms of knowledge? This article denies the first and affirms the latter, thus arguing against Grubes thesis and uses the importance of the historicity of Jesus resurrection as a litmus test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Reply to Henk van den Belts and Rick Benjamins articles (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.2.003.VAND |