Reply to Henk van den Belts and Rick Benjamins articles: The resurrection and the subject philosophy
In the first part, Dirk-Martin Grube follows Paul Tillichs leads by suggesting that revelation consists primarily in knowledge of knowledge rather than knowledge of facts. Grube holds that the evidence for the resurrection is such that its historicity can neither be confirmed (against Henk van den...
| Published in: | NTT |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
NTT
|
| RelBib Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NBB Doctrine of Revelation NBE Anthropology NBF Christology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Miracles
B (Historicity of the) resurrection B knowledge (of knowledge) B Paul Tillich B facts B logical undecidability B subject philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In the first part, Dirk-Martin Grube follows Paul Tillichs leads by suggesting that revelation consists primarily in knowledge of knowledge rather than knowledge of facts. Grube holds that the evidence for the resurrection is such that its historicity can neither be confirmed (against Henk van den Belt) nor denied. Rather, it should be considered to be logically undecidable. Different from Van den Belt, Grube follows Tillich by sympathizing with the independence model for relating religion to science. In the second part, Grube takes up the issue Rick Benjamins focusses on, subject philosophy. After delving into the different positions on the way in which Tillich has adopted this philosophy, Grube evaluates subject philosophy, partly deviating from Benjamins, partly agreeing with him. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Revelation and the Unity of the Truth (2020)"
Kritik von "Tillich and the Philosophy of the Subject (2020)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.2.005.GRUB |